0
Maggie Fong Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

He walked under (the) birches

Hello teachers. I am describing a man who walked under some birches.
1. He walked under birches.
2. He walked under the birches.
If I am mentioning these birches for the first time, is either one of them incorrect?
I opt for #1 (under birches), because they have not been mentioned before. But I think #2 is OK too (it's the birches that were there), especially if the context makes sense for them to be there (for example, if I am talking about a forest, where one expects birches).
Yes? No? Am I offside?
Thanks
Maggie
  

Top answer

Hello, Maggie—and welcome to English Forums. Thank you for registering as a member. Maggie Fong If I am mentioning these birches for the first time, is either one of them incorrect?

  • Hello, Maggie—and welcome to English Forums.
  • Thank you for registering as a member.
  • Maggie Fong If I am mentioning these birches for the first time, is either one of them incorrect?
  • 'The' is not correct in the context you present.
  • Maggie Fong if the context makes sense for them to be there (for example, if I am talking about a forest, where one expects birches).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
Hello, Maggie—and welcome to English Forums. Thank you for registering as a member.
Maggie FongIf I am mentioning these birches for the first time, is either one of them incorrect?
'The' is not correct in the context you present.
Maggie Fong if the context makes sense for them to be there (for example, if I am talking about a forest, whe
0
Thank you so much for your answer, Mr. Micawber, and for welcoming me. Emotion: smile

But what if I were to substitute "birches" with "tr
0
Maggie FongBut what if I were to substitute "birches" with "trees"? "He walked under trees" - that sounds less natural than "under the trees", particularly if one is describing a park/forest.
If you mention a forest, it by definition includes trees, but it does not by definition include birches. So with 'trees' you can use 'the' if you mention a forest. The
0
Mister MicawberIf you mention a forest, it by definition includes trees, but it does not by definition include birches. So with 'trees' you can use 'the' if you mention a forest. The same holds true of birds; you can expect birds but you cannot necessarily expect bulbuls.While we are on the topic, we would probably not use zero article anyway; we would use the plural inde
0
Oh, and (please don't get upset):

The girl went to the park and walked under the green trees.

That "green" in there . . . I suppose that the definite article is correct, since people expect trees to be green, especially if it's summer.

And that is my final question.
0
Maggie Fong1. The girl woke up, opened the window, and listened to birds singing. Correct, but #2 and #3 are better.2. The girl woke up, opened the window, and listened to some birds singing. Correct.3. The girl woke up, opened the window, and listened to the birds singing. Correct as well.Did I get it?
Those all seem fine to me, yes.
0
Maggie FongThe girl went to the park and walked under the green trees.That "green" in there . . . I suppose that the definite article is correct, since people expect trees to be green, especially if it's summer.
Yes, right.
0
Thank you so much for your help and patience, Mister Micawber!

Related Questions