Hello, Maggie—and welcome to English Forums. Thank you for registering as a member. Maggie Fong If I am mentioning these birches for the first time, is either one of them incorrect?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Maggie FongIf I am mentioning these birches for the first time, is either one of them incorrect?'The' is not correct in the context you present.
Maggie Fong if the context makes sense for them to be there (for example, if I am talking about a forest, whe
Maggie FongBut what if I were to substitute "birches" with "trees"? "He walked under trees" - that sounds less natural than "under the trees", particularly if one is describing a park/forest.If you mention a forest, it by definition includes trees, but it does not by definition include birches. So with 'trees' you can use 'the' if you mention a forest. The
Mister MicawberIf you mention a forest, it by definition includes trees, but it does not by definition include birches. So with 'trees' you can use 'the' if you mention a forest. The same holds true of birds; you can expect birds but you cannot necessarily expect bulbuls.While we are on the topic, we would probably not use zero article anyway; we would use the plural inde
Maggie Fong1. The girl woke up, opened the window, and listened to birds singing. Correct, but #2 and #3 are better.2. The girl woke up, opened the window, and listened to some birds singing. Correct.3. The girl woke up, opened the window, and listened to the birds singing. Correct as well.Did I get it?Those all seem fine to me, yes.
Maggie FongThe girl went to the park and walked under the green trees.That "green" in there . . . I suppose that the definite article is correct, since people expect trees to be green, especially if it's summer.Yes, right.