0
Champunique Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

He or Him

0 Hi Teachers, 02br
00Will you please help me. 02br
00Which one in following sentence{HE or HIM} is grammitically correct? 02br
01i00This company has no objection to HE/HIM joining in other company02i02br
00i found 01i00HE02i00 in one of the clearance certificate of my friend. 0-
  

Top answer

0 Hi, 02br 02br 00It's "Him". 02br 02br 00It has to be an object after a preposition. 02br 02br 00The word "he" is a subject and therefore it can't be "he".

  • 0 Hi, 02br 02br 00It's "Him".
  • 02br 02br 00It has to be an object after a preposition.
  • 02br 02br 00The word "he" is a subject and therefore it can't be "he".
  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
0 Hi, 02br
02br
00It's "Him". 02br
02br
00It has to be an object after a preposition. 02br
02br
00The word "he" is a subject and therefore it can't be "he". 0-
0
0 To victorycountry, 02br
02br
00How about this sentence, 02br
02br
00"This company has no objection to HIS joining other company.'' 02br
02br
00Is it also wrong?? 0-
0
0 Hi, temico. 02br
02br
00Please have a look here, 02br
02br
00[url="05000"]His/Him[/url] 0250hrefhttp://webster.commnet.edu/grammar/gerunds.htm
0
0 Hello champers 02br
02br
01i00This company has no objection to HE/HIM joining in other company02i02br
02br
00Quite apart from the he/him question, this sentence isn't correct. It should be either: 02br
02br
00a) 'This company has no objection to him joining 01b00another02b00 company.' 02br
0
0 To MrP, 02br
02br
00Re: 'This company has no objection to his joining another company.' 02br
02br
00You are right in your corrections. I deleted the "in" in the sentence but forgot to change "other" to "another". When I realised my omission, it was too late because I couldn't edit my post. 02br
02br
00I wonder if you approve of post
0
0 Hello Temico 02br
02br
00The edit button does disappear distressingly quickly, on occasion. 02br
02br
00On the question of the webpage, I hesitate to speak for another member, but I believe v/c was referring to the section headed 'Using Possessives with Gerunds'. I would guess that this was intended as a helpful response to your question about whether '
0
0 MrP, 02br
02br
00If you don't mind, I would like to state that "that helpful response" is equivalent to the reply, "Go and check with my mother." when you ask a girl if she was coming to a party or not!! 0-
0
0 No one is obliged to offer help here, Temico; and no one is obliged to take what is offered. 02br
02br
00But even in the latter case, 'thank you' is the customary reply. 02br
02br
00MrP 0-
0
0 Hi everybody, 02br
00it may be too simple and funny for those who are experts in english and who study english as mother tongue. But for us studying english as the 2nd or 3rd language, it is very usual to encounter those type of sentences. 02br
00The website and forums have been really beneficial for us who have just started to learn english as foreign language, and i t
0
0 Hello champunique 02br
02br
00I assure you that no one here found your post too simple, or funny in any way – quite the contrary. 02br
02br
00The discussion that followed your original post concerned my and Temico's posts, rather than yours. 02br
02br
00It was not intended as a comment on your original question. My apologies if we gav

Related Questions