0
Rizan Malik Posted 5 years ago
Grammar

He is the type of person who can/could appear

Situation 1: the speaker doesn't know whether the person has ever appeared in a fashion magazine.

a) He can/could appear in any fashion magazine he wants/wanted to.

b) He is the type of person who can/could appear in a fashion magazine.

Q1: Which is more idiomatic/correct: "can" or "could"?


Situation 2: the speaker knows the person has already appeared in several fashion magazines.

c) He can/could appear in any fashion magazine he wants/wanted to.

d) He is the type of person who can/could appear in a fashion magazine.

Q2: Which is more idiomatic/correct: "can" or "could"?


Note: in all of them, the speaker is commenting on his looks, his potential to appear in a magazine.

  

Top answer

Rizan Malik Situation 1: the speaker doesn't know whether the person has ever appeared in a fashion magazine. a) He can/could appear in any fashion magazine he wants/wanted to. b) He is the type of person who can/could appear in a fashion magazine.

  • Rizan Malik Situation 1: the speaker doesn't know whether the person has ever appeared in a fashion magazine.
  • a) He can/could appear in any fashion magazine he wants/wanted to.
  • b) He is the type of person who can/could appear in a fashion magazine.
  • Q1: Which is more idiomatic/correct: "can" or "could"?
  • could / wanted could I'm inclined to add "probably" after "could" in both cases.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Rizan Malik

Situation 1: the speaker doesn't know whether the person has ever appeared in a fashion magazine.

a) He can/could appear in any fashion magazine he wants/wanted to.

b) He is the type of person who can/could appear in a fashion magazine.

Q1: Which is more idiomatic/correct: "can" or "could"?

could /

Related Questions