0
Gutasniff Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Have to Versus Must

Hi,

I'm trying to do an excercise. I have to chose which one is the INCORRECT answer.

Although human beings aren't able to percieve such changes, it is thought the the sensitive nervous systems of some animals COULD / HAVE TO / MUST be affected by them.

The answer is apparently "have to" although I cannot understand why - its seems to be that each option is correct! Could refering to possibility and "must to" and "have to" being used to express certainty ?

Thanks
  

Top answer

have to is not as good as could or must , so have to should be chosen as the "incorrect" answer. Here's why. , involving logical possibility and necessity.

  • have to is not as good as could or must , so have to should be chosen as the "incorrect" answer.
  • Here's why.
  • , involving logical possibility and necessity.
  • , involving personal obligations, and only less often as a modal of logic.
  • The situation described in the sentence ( nervous systems -- affected by certain changes ) seems to me to involve logic, not social interaction.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
have to is not as good as could or must, so have to should be chosen as the "incorrect" answer. Here's why.

Both could and must are modals of logic, i.e., involving logical possibility and necessity. have to is typically used as a modal of social interaction, i.e., involving personal obligations, and only less often as a modal of log

Related Questions