nsfs2 What is the future form of 'have to'? 'will have to' nsfs2 Do the following have the same tense and convey the same meaning? No.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
nsfs2What is the future form of 'have to'?'will have to'
nsfs2Do the following have the same tense and convey the same meaning?No. No. But the meaning is very similar. The first implies that the obligation to face the consequences starts immediately. The second implies that the obligation to face the consequences will
CalifJim nsfs2What is the future form of 'have to'?'will have to'nsfs2Do the following have the same tense and convey the same meaning?No. No. But the meaning is very similar. The first implies that the obligation to face the consequences starts immediately. The second implies that the obligation to face the consequences will start later. Because of these differences, the
nsfs2If I wanted to say that someone is actually doing 'that' repeatedly and 'has to face the consequences', do I have to use a different word other than 'if'?No, you don't have to, because the context will probably be enough to make clear what you mean.
CalifJim nsfs2If I wanted to say that someone is actually doing 'that' repeatedly and 'has to face the consequences', do I have to use a different word other than 'if'?No, you don't have to, because the context will probably be enough to make clear what you mean.Nevertheless, I think most people prefer to express that idea with "whenever".Whenever you do that, you have to