0Can't get this one to play right in my head, using any grammar. I'm a 2nd year language student writing a paper and it needs to be perfect:-) 02br 02br 01i00Astronauts (who) have (01span00having02span00) the best physical en mental conditions, are most likely to be sent to the ISS (Smolders, 1980).02i02br 02br 00This is a quote from a book but why did they use have and not having? Is there any difference with having? I feel having is better because the astronauts would have to have the qualities every time they go to space. They shouldn't 'lose' them intermittently. 02br 00As native speakers, what would you suggest? 02br 02br 00many thanks,02br 00 Jeroen 02br 02br 00Jeroen 0-
Top answer
02i 00 0-
— Mister Micawber
02i 00 0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 .02br 00These are both correct and have the same meaning:02br 02br 01i00Astronauts 01b00who have02b00 the best physical 01b00and02b00 mental conditions are most likely to be sent to the ISS (Smolders, 1980).02i02br 01i00Astronauts 01b00having02b00 the best phys