0
IanKCH Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Have lived/ Lived in Tokyo for three years?

Hi,

I would like to ask if the sentence "I lived in Tokyo for three years" is grammatically sound.

My understanding of this sentence is that I lived in Tokyo for three years in the past, and I am no longer living there anymore. Is that correct?

However, if I were to still live in Tokyo, then should I use "I have lived in Tokyo for three years" instead? Since the present perfect tense suggests that I am still living there?
  

Top answer

My understanding of this sentence is that I lived in Tokyo for three years in the past, and I (am no longer living) (no need for Present Continuous) no longer live there anymore. Is that correct? YES However, if I (were to still live) was still living in Tokyo, then should I use "I have lived in Tokyo for three years" instead?

  • My understanding of this sentence is that I lived in Tokyo for three years in the past, and I (am no longer living) (no need for Present Continuous) no longer live there anymore.
  • Is that correct?
  • YES However, if I (were to still live) was still living in Tokyo, then should I use "I have lived in Tokyo for three years" instead?
  • Since the present perfect tense suggests that I am still living there?
  • YES But note: He: I think New York is the best city in the world.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
My understanding of this sentence is that I lived in Tokyo for three years in the past, and I (am no longer living) (no need for Present Continuous) no longer live there anymore. Is that correct? YES
0
You are correct on all counts.

Related Questions