0
Clarence Posted 21 years ago
Grammar
have got, have, got: Is there any difference?
0 Is there any difference?: 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 00 0-
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 00 0-
Top answer
0 I think they are all synonymous, Clarence. 0-
- 0 I think they are all synonymous, Clarence.
- 0-
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
10 Answers
0
0
0
0 Is there any difference?: 02 br
02 br
00 1. I’ve got a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 2. I’ve a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 3. I got a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I don't know this engages. 02 br
00 Bu
02 br
00 1. I’ve got a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 2. I’ve a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 3. I got a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I don't know this engages. 02 br
00 Bu
00
0 01 blockquote
01 cite 10 clarence 12 cite 12 br
10 Is there any difference?: 12 br
12 br
10 <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> I 11 b 10 ’ve 12 b 10 11 b 10 got 12 b 10 a feeling this engages him more. 12 br
12 br
10 <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->
00
0 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 To my ear, the first two have the same meaning, but "
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 ’ve 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 I 01 b 00 got 02 b 00 a feeling this engages him more. 02 br
02 br
00 To my ear, the first two have the same meaning, but "
00
0
Thank you for your replies. I think I feel the same as what Khoff has explained too.
00
I'm not native either. Not from any english speaking country, that is, of course. But I spent years in the u.s.a as a child and used to get better grades in engish than my native north american classmates. Don't mean to say 'look how cool I am', but now I teach english and have a good cores in tests and so forth...
Anyway, I agree with Khoff, I think it's the logical way of interpreting it, a
Anyway, I agree with Khoff, I think it's the logical way of interpreting it, a
00
Hello
I am English teacher in Brazil ,the difference is in the grammar....as follows :
Have got = present perfect- which is have+ past participle , this relates something that started in the past with the present
have = present simple it indicated present meaning only and normally shows possesssion
got is the past of get so it is simple past
if you need more information ple
I am English teacher in Brazil ,the difference is in the grammar....as follows :
Have got = present perfect- which is have+ past participle , this relates something that started in the past with the present
have = present simple it indicated present meaning only and normally shows possesssion
got is the past of get so it is simple past
if you need more information ple
00
Both "I have got" and "I have" are correct, but though they are synonymous, "have got" may sound more emphatic depending on how you express the words.
"I got," on the other hand, is incorrect here. The only time "I got" is grammatically correct is when you are referring to how something came to you, e.g., "I got it in the mail," or "I got the feeling the moment I heard James Brown sing,
"I got," on the other hand, is incorrect here. The only time "I got" is grammatically correct is when you are referring to how something came to you, e.g., "I got it in the mail," or "I got the feeling the moment I heard James Brown sing,
0
Related Questions