First, please, which do you think, and why?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Anonymouswhich is more correct?why?Your first sentence, to me, is correct, because the verb 'arrive' is a moment-verb. If you say your #2 (have been arriving), it would mean that the people who started to arrive are still arriving, and haven't reach the destination (Australia). So, I'd say your first sentence "In Australia, since 1945 over six thousand peo
Anonymoususe since and for with present perfect simple and continuous.Yes, you are right in saying that we can use either present perfect simple or continuous with 'since' or 'for'. But both the sentences have the word 'settle' in them and the speaker actually wants to say how many people have settled in Australia since 1945.
Laborious Anonymoususe since and for with present perfect simple and continuous.Yes, you are right in saying that we can use either present perfect simple or continuous with 'since' or 'for'. But both the sentences have the word 'settle' in them and the speaker actually wants to say how many people have settled in Australia since 1945. That's what I think of the two sente
AnonymousMy English has improved since I came to Australia.My English has been improving since I came to Australia.Both the tenses (present perfect simple and present perfect continuous/progressive) can be used to express that an action began in the past and is still going on or has just finished. In many cases, both forms are correct, but there is oft
AnonymousHiIs this sentence correct or not, they have been arrivedIs it right if i say I have been arrived in lisbon on alril 19?