1 and 2 are ungrammatical in this context. 3 and 4 mean the same thing as the original sentence, but American talk show hosts don't speak like this (3 and 4 are wordy, and on a talk show brevity is generally the norm). Moreover, the phrase "has a new movie opening" is idiomatic in this context.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
JungKimI'd like to know why 'open' is not possible with the present simple 'has', as in (1), but is possible with the prediction 'is going to have', as in (4). Any thoughts?In (1) 'open' will be taken to be an adjective; in (4) 'open' will be taken to be a verb.
CalifJimIn (1) 'open' will be taken to be an adjective; in (4) 'open' will be taken to be a verb.Thanks, CJ.
JungKimNow that 'premiere' cannot be taken to be an adjective, is (1') possible English?Yes.
JungKimOr does 'premiere' have to be changed to 'premiering' as follows?Matt Damon has a new movie premiering on FridayNo.
CalifJimIn (1) 'open' will be taken to be an adjective; in (4) 'open' will be taken to be a verb. 1 ... has a movie (which is already) open ..It's anomalous to speak of a movie being open. We don't say The movie is open. The door is open, but not The movie is open.2 ... is going to have a movie open ...Causative "have". "have a movie open" ~ "arrange for a movie to open"C
Jonathan MarianuMatt (noun) has a movie (adj) opening (noun)... has a movie (noun) opening