Hasn't there and mustn't there

There has to be something wrong with you. This is not a question; it is a statement.
Hasn't there be something? This is not correct. I would ask "Is there something wrong with you?" or "Isn't there something wrong with you?"

There must be

AnonymousThere has to be something wrong with you.

Doesn't there have to be something wrong with you?

AnonymousThere must be something wrong with you.

Mustn't there be something wrong with you?

CJ

I should add that rhetorical questions are not supposed to be answered:

There something wrong with you, buddy?

What do you think you're doing?

This food not good enough for you?

None of these (and similar types of questions) are supposed to be answered.

I've heard "There has to be something wrong, hasn't there?"

I'm wondering about 'hasn't there' If you had to finish the sentence "hasn't there...." how would it go?

AnonymousThere has to be something wrong, hasn't there?

Hasn't there to be something wrong?

Totally ridiculous sounding to an American, but possible, I suppose.

CJ

If you only say

There has to be something wrong, hasn't there?

Is that something that is natural?

AnonymousIf you only say There has to be something wrong, hasn't there?Is that something that is natural?

Not to me.

There has to be ... / There doesn't have to be ...

There has to be ..., doesn't there?

CJ

The correct version is " There has to be something wrong, doesn't there?" and not "There has to be something wrong, hasn't there?"

This I have come across.
There is something wrong, isn't there?

What goes in place of isn't there?

There has to be something wrong, isn't there?