0
Anonymous Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

has/have

Am I am correct in saying that the highlighted HAS(S) should be replaced by have?

Thanks

'I think the cruel vilification and character assassination of ZIggy by BB and its spin-off programmes HAS gone far enough and HAS overstepped the bounds of human decency and dignity'
  

Top answer

Not really, though it is possible. The writer obviously thinks that 'vilification and assassination' are parts of the same single act, and I tend to agree.

— Mister Micawber

  • Not really, though it is possible.
  • The writer obviously thinks that 'vilification and assassination' are parts of the same single act, and I tend to agree.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Not really, though it is possible. The writer obviously thinks that 'vilification and assassination' are parts of the same single act, and I tend to agree.
0
0
Formally, it should be have.
0
0
No, you are wrong, Anonymous.
0

Related Questions