0
Katrinarc Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Has nothing to do

Hi, I know the correct expression is "that has nothing to do", but could I say "that nothing has to do" in order to emphasize it? The sentence is the following:

When I exclaim 'My God' in the preceding phrase, I make use of a very licit literary device that nothing has to do with my personal beliefs.
  

Top answer

This sentence is OK: When I exclaim 'My ***' in the preceding phrase, I make use of a very licit literary device that has nothing to do with my personal beliefs. It doesn't make sense to invert the subject (that) and verb (has).

  • This sentence is OK: When I exclaim 'My ***' in the preceding phrase, I make use of a very licit literary device that has nothing to do with my personal beliefs.
  • It doesn't make sense to invert the subject (that) and verb (has).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
This sentence is OK:

When I exclaim 'My ***' in the preceding phrase, I make use of a very licit literary device that has nothing to do with my personal beliefs.

It doesn't make sense to invert the subject (that) and verb (has).
0
Hi,

I know the correct expression is "that has nothing to do", but could I say "that nothing has to do" in order to emphasize it? I suppose you could, but it does sound a bit strange.

I'm not completely surprised that someone who uses the word 'licit' wants to try to use an odd an
0
katrinarcI know the correct expression is "that has nothing to do", but could I say "that nothing has to do" in order to emphasize it?
No. You won't succeed in emphasizing anything. You'll just mystify your reader.

CJ

Related Questions