| Quote: |
| "Let me ask you this, though, Scott. As a practical matter, hasn't the independent prosecution been something of a failure? What do we have? They spent $ 40 million. We have Ollie for security fence which he shouldn't have taken, convicted on that, convicted of deceiving Congress. Nobody has gone to jail." |
| Quote: |
| MARK JOHNSON "Well, I think that for him to compare Saudi Arabia to Iraq is a little bit unfair to the Saudis. It's perhaps like comparing a delinquent to a serial murderer. I fully agree that Iraq is not the only barbarous regime in the world or the region, but the difference is that in the case of Iraq we had an evil regime which was on the march. Iraq has gone to war twice now in the last decade, first against Iran and then against Kuwait, and I think most Americans now realize that if we hadn't moved to stop Iraq now, we would inevitably been obligated to stop Iraq later, but under circumstances where Baghdad would have been much more difficult and dangerous to deal with than it is at present." |
Anonymous In AmEng, does "nobody has gone to jail" mean "nobody is in jail" in a context such as the above? It means no one has been convicted and sent to jail (as of the date this statement was made). No one is (yet) in jail over these wrong-doings.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousIn AmEng, does "nobody has gone to jail" mean "nobody is in jail" in a context such as the above?
It means no one has been convicted and sent to jail (as of the date this statement was made). No one is (yet) in jail over these wrong-doings.
AnonymousIn AmEng, does "nobody has gone to jail" mean "nobody is in jail" in a context such as the above?Not exactly. ... is in jail is about the current state of affairs. ... has gone to jail is about the experience of being put in jail. It's "Nobody is in this state just now" vs. "Nobody has had this experience up until now".
Anonymouswhat's the difference in meaning, etc, between "they've gone to war twice in the last decade" and "they've been to war twice in the last decade", in AmEng?None, really, as I would accept been for gone, but gone seems more idiomatic in AmE (to my ear). It seems to me we use the idiom with been mostly for individuals' visit
CalifJimAnonymouswhat's the difference in meaning, etc, between "they've gone to war twice in the last decade" and "they've been to war twice in the last decade", in AmEng?None, really, as I would accept been for gone, but gone seems more idiomatic in AmE (to my ear). It seems to me we use the idiom with been
AnonymousHave you any ideas about when and why that "has/have gone to" form developed in AmEng?Why do you see it as a development in AmE, old chap? As opposed to e.g. an older usage, from which BrE has diverged?