With respect to the first three, in conversation, they are all about the same. That having been stated, none of them are very good. " Contemporary usage encourages structures in which the noun and the verb drive the thought or action with minimum ambiguity.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
ed_shawWith respect to the first three, in conversation, they are all about the same. That having been stated, none of them are very good.
Contemporary usage discourages opening the sentence with either a pronoun reference that is not quite specific, as has been done in all three of the examples, or, with what is called a "dummy
subject," such as, "Ther
alc241 It's half as cheap to buy a house here as there.I think that the problem with all of these is that "half as cheap" and "half as expensive" are meaningless. Suppose one house costs $100,000 and another costs $200,00
2 It's half as expensive to buy a house here as there.
3 It's twice as cheap/twice as expensive to buy a house here as there.
alc24Which would you say please?I prefer 2, especially if you change it to What's, but 1 is also fine.
1 How is the pay here? (salary)
2 What is the pay like here?
3What is the pay here?
alc24It doesn't work with cheap and expensive when using halfNo, "twice as cheap" is no better than "half as cheap." It's because you have no way to measure how cheap or expensive something is -- those are subjective terms. The only thing yo
but with TWICE??
1 It's twice as expensive here as there.
2 It's twice as cheap here as there.