". In speech, some speakers insert an extra have (or 've ) where I have placed the asterisk. There is no recognised tense consisting of had + have + past participle,.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GPY it is one of my pet hates.I used to feel the same way, but I have changed over the years. It does seem to be a natural part of the language, the spoken language at least, of many speakers. I suspect that if descriptive linguists were to analyse English with no preconceptions, they might well report it simply as a variant form .in the spoken language.
fivejedjonI used to feel the same way, but I have changed over the years. It does seem to be a natural part of the language, the spoken language at least, of many speakers. I suspect that if descriptive linguists were to analyse English with no preconceptions, they might well report it simply as a variant form .in the spoken language.Do you feel that it has b
fivejedjonHuddleston and Pullum (CGLE (2002.151) say of this construction in speech: It appears to be increasing in frequency,Thanks, that's interesting. That was my feeling too, but I wasn't sure if I was just noticing it more.