kenkenken9876 In the above passage, why "had had been missing" is used instead of "had been missing"?? It is a typing mistake. kenkenken9876 Also, I wonder in the below case "had had been" can be used?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
kenkenken9876In the above passage, why "had had been missing" is used instead of "had been missing"??It is a typing mistake.
kenkenken9876Also, I wonder in the below case "had had been" can be used?No.
Mister Micawber kenkenken9876In the above passage, why "had had been missing" is used instead of "had been missing"??It is a typing mistake.kenkenken9876Also, I wonder in the below case "had had been" can be used?No.I first thought so, but when I searched on the Internet, using the keyword "had had been", over hundreds of millions hit.
kenkenken9876 which case, "had had been" could be grammatical or meaningful?No, never. In 'had had', the second 'had' is the past participle of the main verb.