0
Khoshtip Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

had been and were

Can we replace had been in the following sentence with the were? They don't seem to be identical.

We had been waiting for the plane an hour before it landed.
  

Top answer

"Had been waiting" denotes the duration of your waiting before the plane landed so it is better as it is.

  • "Had been waiting" denotes the duration of your waiting before the plane landed so it is better as it is.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
"Had been waiting" denotes the duration of your waiting before the plane landed so it is better as it is.
0
Thanks. Fine argument.
0
khoshtipWe had been waiting for the plane an hour before it landed.
Fine. A possible second version: We waited for the plane an hour before it landed. (Not were waiting. an hour is somewhat incompatible with the past continuous.)

CJ
0
So generally when we speak about duration of the time in the past we must use perfect continues tense, yeah?
0
khoshtipSo generally when we speak about duration of the time in the past we must use perfect continues tense, yeah?
Not always. It depends on the context.

As shown above by CJ, either past tense or past perfect continuous tense suits the context there.
0
khoshtipSo generally when we speak about duration of the time in the past we must use the perfect continuous tense
No, not at all. You can use any of these to speak about a duration of time:

past
past continuous
present perfect
present perfect continuous
past per
0
Thanks guys. But CJ, I can't accept your first example above, because of the "while".
0
khoshtipI can't accept your first example above, because of the "while".
I understand this to mean that you don't believe that the verbs in that sentence signify extended activity through time.

Maybe you mean something other than that? If so, maybe you should explain what troubles you about that sentence.

CJ

Related Questions