0
New2grammar Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

guardian vs caretaker

0guardian- a person who cares for persons or property02br
02br
01b00caretaker02b00 - a custodian who is hired to take care of something (property or a person)02br
02br
00Is there any difference between a caretaker and a guardian. I have to say I'm a bit surprised by the dictionary definition of caretaker. To my knowledge, a caretaker is like a temporary guardian. I could be wrong. 02br
02br
00Please advise. Thanks!0-
  

Top answer

0A guardian will usually have legal rights regarding the person they are taking care of. I would not use the word guardian to apply to property. " I think of a caretaker far more for 01i 00property 02i 00than a person.

  • 0A guardian will usually have legal rights regarding the person they are taking care of.
  • I would not use the word guardian to apply to property.
  • " I think of a caretaker far more for 01i 00property 02i 00than a person.
  • Interestingly, a "caregiver" is almost the same word, but used for people.
  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
0A guardian will usually have legal rights regarding the person they are taking care of. I would not use the word guardian to apply to property. (Perhaps another US/UK difference.)02br
02br
00A caretaker simply provides "care." I think of a caretaker far more for 01i00property 02i00than a person. Interestingly, a "caregiver" is almost the same word, but
0
0I got it all wrong. I wonder what you would call in the following context02br
02br
00A group of children were taken away and are currently at a shelter with caretakers/caregivers.0-
0
0Temporary guardians, or caretakers - it does work with children in this context. Actually caregivers and care providers all work in this instance. The context makes it so clear.02br
02br
00I was just remarking to my coworker that it's funny that caretaker and caregiver sound like they should be opposites, but they are not!0-
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Grammar Geek12cite10Temporary guardians, or caretakers - it does work with children in this context.12br
12blockquote
10I think of a caretaker as a vocation and a guardian as a responsibility. 02br
02br
00Personally I'd never use caretaker for a child under some sort of protection o
0
0Thanks GG. Bokeh, thanks for your opinion. For what it's worth, an article on CNN used caretakers. 0-
0
I wonder, then, what we would call the person who receives the care. She is taking it from someone who gives it, but is not a "caretaker." Interesting definition puzzle!
0
  • the cared-for (Nel noddings) :academic term-receiver

  • the carer (Nel noddings) :academic term-giver

Related Questions