0
Snarf Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

...great thinkers whom...

They enthusiastically discussed the great thinkers whom they have studied.

Is "whom" right there? Are "the great thinkers" subjects?

Thanks.
  

Top answer

Snarf Is "whom" right there? Yes. Snarf Are "the great thinkers" subjects?

  • Snarf Is "whom" right there?
  • Yes.
  • Snarf Are "the great thinkers" subjects?
  • No, it’s the object of discussed .
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
SnarfIs "whom" right there?
Yes.
SnarfAre "the great thinkers" subjects?
No, it’s the object of discussed.
0
So it's dependent on "they" which is a subject, right?
0
Snarf....They enthusiastically discussed the great thinkers whom they have studied.

Is "whom" right there? Yes, but "whom" can be omitted. Are "the great thinkers" subjects? No, if they were subjects, 'who' would be correct.
0
SnarfSo it's dependent on "they" which is a subject, right? No, it's not dependent on "they".
0
SnarfSo it's dependent on "they" which is a subject, right?
I’m not sure I understand your question.

This is the way you should analyze the sentence:

They enthusiastically discussed the great thinkers whom they have studied.

discussed = verb
the great thinkers = direct obje
0
Aspara GusI wouldn’t go along with that.
The great thinkers whom they have studied were enthusiastically discussed.
The great thinkers is now the subject, but whom remains the object of the verb studied.
I don't mean that.
I mean that if in the original sentence there were a verb that 'whom' would be the subject of, 'who' infact would be co
0
canadian45See the example sentence in my original post.
Skimmed over it. Emotion: tongue tied

The
0
Aspara GusThey enthusiastically discussed the great thinkers who lived in the sixteenth century.
I still don’t get it. The great thinkers is still an object. Yes, it's still an object of "discussed",but in my example sentence it's also the subject of tthe verb "lived".

The example isn’t consistent with No, if they were su
0
canadian45Yes, it's still an object of "discussed",but in my example sentence it's also the subject of tthe verb "lived".
No. A word cannot be both a subject and an object. In your example, who is the subject of the relative clause who lived in the sixteenth century, which defines the object the great thinkers.
canadian45
0
Aspara Gus wrote" No. A word cannot be both a subject and an object. In your example, who is the subject of the relative clause who lived in the sixteenth century, which defines the object the great thinkers."
-----------------------------------------
That's why we have to choose one or the other, as in the "whoever'whomever" examples in my previous post.

Related Questions