0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar
grammer /letter help
Hello, I am not sure this is the correct place but I will see if anyone is able to help.
I am trying to write an email but the flow just is not there. I think my punctuation is off, I feel that it is redundant, it seems ;poorly written and at this point I just need help.( I have changed it so many times that nothing seems correct anymore and I am just making it worse. )
If someone can please help me rewrite it.
this is the middle part of the email that I need help with:
Your wife saw my windshield as she cut in front of me, and yes she is correct my windshield was fine, there was no cracks. But had your wife went over to my vehicle after the crash to see what damages she had caused she would of than noticed a crack in my windshield. Your wife parked her car across the street and did not come back to my vehicle to look at the damages in which it sustained. Sorry your wife did not look to see my windshield damage but as you'll see from the estimate I received 1 day after the crash, the damage was there. The accident happened on2/12/15, the first estimate from Dugens was on 02/13/15. So no, as it seems your trying to imply, there was not a lapse in time from the accident to when the crack appeared. Your wife just simply did not come over to my vehicle after the crash to see the damages in which she had caused.
I am trying to write an email but the flow just is not there. I think my punctuation is off, I feel that it is redundant, it seems ;poorly written and at this point I just need help.( I have changed it so many times that nothing seems correct anymore and I am just making it worse. )
If someone can please help me rewrite it.
this is the middle part of the email that I need help with:
Your wife saw my windshield as she cut in front of me, and yes she is correct my windshield was fine, there was no cracks. But had your wife went over to my vehicle after the crash to see what damages she had caused she would of than noticed a crack in my windshield. Your wife parked her car across the street and did not come back to my vehicle to look at the damages in which it sustained. Sorry your wife did not look to see my windshield damage but as you'll see from the estimate I received 1 day after the crash, the damage was there. The accident happened on2/12/15, the first estimate from Dugens was on 02/13/15. So no, as it seems your trying to imply, there was not a lapse in time from the accident to when the crack appeared. Your wife just simply did not come over to my vehicle after the crash to see the damages in which she had caused.
Top answer
Yes, your wife did see my windshield as she cut in front of me on February 12, and yes , she is correct in her claim that my windshield was fine; there were no cracks at that time. After the accident, your wife parked her car across the street and did not come back to my vehicle to inspect the damage. As you see from the first estimate (Dugens, dated 2/13/15, attached), the crack is listed as part of the damage report.
- Yes, your wife did see my windshield as she cut in front of me on February 12, and yes , she is correct in her claim that my windshield was fine; there were no cracks at that time.
- After the accident, your wife parked her car across the street and did not come back to my vehicle to inspect the damage.
- As you see from the first estimate (Dugens, dated 2/13/15, attached), the crack is listed as part of the damage report.
- In summary, the windshield crack was not present immediately prior to the accident, and it is listed on the estimate for repairs the next day.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
2 Answers
0
Yes, your wife did see my windshield as she cut in front of me on February 12, and yes, she is correct in her claim that my windshield was fine; there were no cracks at that time. After the accident, your wife parked her car across the street and did not come back to my vehicle to inspect the damage. As you see from the first estimate (Dugens, dated 2/13/15, attached),
00
thank you so very much!! That is what I was looking for! sounds 100x better. Thank you!
0
Related Questions