0
Crux_online Posted 21 years ago
Grammar

Grammatical Cases and the English Language

Good day, all!

Read through....the question is at the end.

English cases, though no longer taught as such, are still somewhat present and remnants of the cases in Old English. During the time between say, 1300 and the present, we lost most of the inflections that were present before 1300, but some of the words -- particularly the possessive pronouns -- retained their inflections.

The four cases of Old English are:

Nominative
Genative
Accusative
Dative/Instrumental

The Nominative case gets its name from the idea that it is the 'naming' case. It identifies the subject of the sentence by name.

The Genative case gets its name by pointing out the 'genesis' of the noun. "Brother of mine", "Goblet of silver". Generally, anywhere 'of' is used, the object of the preposition will be in the Genative case.

Now Accusative and Dative leave me baffled. How did they get their names?

Accusative seems to bring to mind one accusing another. Even in Russian, ??????????? (vi-NI-tyl-ni) is the name of the Accusative case and the root verb of that is ?????? (vi-NIT), to blame, accuse. But how does that apply to the case of a noun in the general role of Direct Object? Or is the premise of Accusative case being equivalent to the Direct Object faulty altogether?

Dative conjures in me the idea of dates. In linguistics, the Dative case is generally used to indicate the Indirect Object. The question becomes, "how/where does the concept of date intersect with the idea of Indirect Object?

Now naturally there are prepositions that require a specific case. In English all prepositions require the Accusative case (the Dative case seems all but lost in Modern English). In German hilfen, to help, requires the Dative, whereas sehen, to see, requires an Accusative object. Whereas this makes perfect sense, there are other that make no sense. This is not the thread for that discussion.

My question, after all that, is this:

Where did the different grammatical cases get there names?

Thanks!
  

Top answer

Hi, Here are a few comments, drawn mostly from recollections of my Latin studies many years ago. My apologies if you know this stuff already. To understand cases, you need to look not only at Old English but, further back, at Latin and then Greek.

  • Hi, Here are a few comments, drawn mostly from recollections of my Latin studies many years ago.
  • My apologies if you know this stuff already.
  • To understand cases, you need to look not only at Old English but, further back, at Latin and then Greek.
  • Latin Cases are: Nominative, Vocative (used to address someone ...
  • Hey, Claudius!
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

10 Answers
0
Hi,

Here are a few comments, drawn mostly from recollections of my Latin studies many years ago. My apologies if you know this stuff already.

To understand cases, you need to look not only at Old English but, further back, at Latin and then Greek.

Latin Cases are: Nominative, Vocative (used to address someone ... Hey, Claudius!), Accusative, Genitive (of ...), Dat
0
Perfect!

That gives me the foundation to look into it further, should the mood strike me.

I'm well acquainted with the Latin cases, but without the backstory you've supplied in part, the best I could ever do is guess at the geneses of the case names.

Interesting what you offered regarding 'dare' --> ... --> Dative. Referring back to Russian (again), ??
0
Hi,

How likely might it be that the Dative case got its name from something other than dare? Well, 'give' for Dative seems a pretty plausible theory to me, since you 'give to' someone.

Now I've googled a bit, and there's lots of info availalbe for review. For example:

From
0
Very nice, Clive.

That helps a lot.

0
None of these names for cases applies much to Modern English; we have neither an accusative nor a dative case and many linguists might argue we do not even have a true genitive (just a "clitic s").

Nouns have an all-purpose "base case" and a possessive form.

My dog is big/I see a dog. (base)

My dog's bed is in the corner. (possessive)

0
Yeah, pronouns do seem to be the retaining pond for Gender and Case.

I once started reading a book that used hse as some sort of androgynous pronoun. It made reading virtually impossible. With a little time, English will eventually lose its case and gender altogether, but forcing it like that makes it no better that pig latin or signs made by the third base coach.
0
Is there no notion of a dative case in English?

I believe that there is, and if it were taught, perhaps we would not be at the end of the process of losing "whom"!
0
There are precious few relics of the Dative case remaining in Modern English. The word whom is currently in its death throes and has been for 100 years or so; and in serious (and possibly fatal) decline during the last fifty.

But it must be remembered that whom is not a resident purely of the Dative domain; rather it is (or has become over several hundred years) an indicat
0
0 "The rose gives the boy a girl" may make no sense to the less poetical of English speakers, but could be epigrammatic to the more sensitive reader (or to the florist looking for a Valentine's Day slogan). Perhaps her affections are bought a trifle cheap, however. She might have held out for a dozen.02br
00--slowpez 0-
0
0All cases have their source in Latin. If you speak only English, then this will be a very hard concept to understand.02br
02br
00Peter0-

Related Questions