Are you happy with "The door will not open, no matter how hard she pushes "? Your sentence with "would" is just the past-tense version of that. Yes, it's active.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Perfect StrangerWhy then would we have to change the voice from active to passive if we wanted to use couldn't?The door couldn't be opened, no matter how hard she pushed."the door couldn't open" sounds as if the door has its own volition.
Perfect StrangerC is the correct answer but... I don't know why.It's an idiomatic use of "won't" and "wouldn't". These mean, more or less, "refuses to" and "refused to", respectively. It seems odd to paraphrase it that way with an inanimate subject, but that's essentially the meaning. Maybe "fail(ed) to" is a better paraphrase with inanimate subjects.
GPY"the door couldn't open" sounds as if the door has its own volition.I agree, but in the right context this should be possible.
CalifJim GPY"the door couldn't open" sounds as if the door has its own volition.I agree, but in the right context this should be possible.They wanted to be sure that the door wouldn't blow away in the approaching hurricane, so they nailed the door shut. That way, the door couldn't open.Or would you say it has to be That way, the door would not be able to open?Or are both
GPYhope we agree that it wouldn't work at all in the original contextYes. The context is wrong for "couldn't" in the original.
Perfect StrangerI'd like to ask about answer D... mightn't.It's the word "pushed" that causes me to reject D as an answer. I could accept, however: