0
Anonymous Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

grammar question

I'm not sure of whether the following sentence is grammatical or not. : I had worked here for ten years two months ago. Furthermore, 'two months before' is possible in lieu of the 'two months ago' ?
  

Top answer

Anonymous I had worked here for ten years two months ago. It's grammatical, but it is a puzzling sentence. You can't work for ten years in a single month.

— CalifJim

  • Anonymous I had worked here for ten years two months ago.
  • It's grammatical, but it is a puzzling sentence.
  • You can't work for ten years in a single month.
  • Less puzzling: I had worked there for two months ten years ago .
  • Anonymous Furthermore, 'two months before' is possible in lieu of the 'two months ago' ?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
AnonymousI had worked here for ten years two months ago.
It's grammatical, but it is a puzzling sentence. You can't work for ten years in a single month.

Less puzzling: I had worked there for two months ten years ago.
AnonymousFurthermore, 'two months before' is possible in lieu of the 'two months ago' ?
Ye
0

Related Questions