Grammar of paragraphs

0I would like to know if the grammar if acceptable. Thanks.02br
02br
001) Annas contends that the view which denies the existence of objective moral values arises from the idea that moral realism conflicts with our knowledge of the world. That is to say, the underlying idea is that the ethical theories that assert the existence of objective moral values conflict with a view of the world which is objective and shared by all, and which affirms the existence of other kinds of entities.02br
02br
002) The other line of argumentation put forward by modern moral skepticism does not focus on the apparent shortcomings of moral inquiry. Rather, it advances a particular conception of its subject matter: moral values do not exist independently of us, but are merely our projections.02br
02br
00The fact that the conflicting positions seem to have the same weight renders the conflicts undecidable (01i00anepikritoi02i00). More precisely, the Pyrrhonist finds (a) an undecidable disagreement among moral doctrines which have differing views about what the good, the bad, and the indifferent are, (b) an undecidable disagreement about what things these notions apply to, and (c) an undecidable disagreement between the doctrines which assert that things are good, bad, or indifferent by nature, and those that deny this. 02br
02br
003) However, the Pyrrhonist does not have this kind of confidence: he is agnostic about all beliefs, and not only about moral beliefs.02br
02br
004) One might object that the unresolved disagreements that exist among the defenders of moral realism show that moral values are not real. However, the fact that a disagreement is unresolved does not imply that none of the conflicting views is correct. Even if the disagreements among moral realists were in themselves undecidable, this would not be sufficient for denying that moral values are objective. For the existence of an undecidable disagreement only manifests the impossibility of determining which of the positions in conflict, if any, is correct. Hence, to deny the objectivity of morality, one needs more than undecided or undecidable conflicts of moral realistic positions; one needs an objective conception of the world with which moral realism is at odds.0-