khoshtip This sentence seems to be of the conditional forms but its structure does not match. 1- This option (some option) is relevant only if you have overridden the table data. It may not match the four commonly taught conditional structures (0-3), but it's still correct and natural.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
khoshtipThis sentence seems to be of the conditional forms but its structure does not match.
1- This option (some option) is relevant only if you have overridden the table data.It may not match the four commonly taught conditional structures (0-3), but it's still correct and natural.
khoshtip cook
khoshtipThis sentence seems to be of the conditional forms but its structure does not match. 1- This option (some option) is relevant only if you have overridden the table data.Hmm. I'd call this a first conditional. I include the present perfect with the present as a possible tense in the main clause of a first conditional. I don't consider the addition o
CalifJimI'd call all three above "first conditionals". Because there is no "will", some people call these "zero conditionals". Use whatever terminology is used in your textbook or your class work.Yeah, you are right. That's you that call that a pattern of conditional forms, not the/my book(s)!
khoshtipI recall the time when I asked MM about prepositions. He said, the verb (e.g., here go) gets the -ing ending when a preposition (e.g., here than) precedes it. And it's essentially always that way. PS: The "to" is an exception.See
khoshtipThe question was about the than. If it's a preposition, why hasn't the verb after it (go)Have a look at the Cambridge Dictionary's "point of view" here:hasn't gottengot the -ing ending (in teechr's point of view)?