grammar help!

0(1) Next I want to mention something perhaps provocative, the idea that everything always has to with oil in the 00.02br
02br
02br
00has to with oil or has to do with oil? Please clarify.02br
02br
02br
00(2) There was little sympathy for Zionism. This can be documented. It was only after the Holocaust that the majority of Jews and the great majority of Western peoples believed that the Jews needed a house against death and, therefore, they supported the state of 00.02br
02br
02br
00Western peoples or Western people? Please advise.02br
02br
02br
00(3) And this also pertains in the West, where people look at the thing with mythical spectacles, instead of 01b00see seeing things02b00 as they are.02br
02br
02br
00Is the usage 01b00see seeing things02b00 ok? Kindly check.02br
02br
02br
00(4) But we have to understand that whatever the history, there are now two peoples in that land. The Jewish state is there. It is de facto. But the Palestinian movement is there, de facto.02br
02br
02br
00two peoples? Is the plural usage ok? 02br
02br
02br
00(5) My question is based on the premise which has 01b00been already been02b00 discussed by the panel: How can this panel challenge yourself to bring the two parties on the discussion table for a dialogue?02br
02br
02br
00Two "been" are there? Can the first 01b00been02b00 be deleted?0-