0 Hi, here is a sentence that is really confusing me - 02br 02br 00We had known each other for 3 years by April. 02br 02br 00I think it's no problem in refer to the grammar used in it, but some say it sounds somewhat strange because of the length of time - "for 3 years" in the questioning sentence. 02br 02br 00I'd appreciate if you could give your opinion about it. 0-
Top answer
0The length of time is irrelevant. ' 02br 02br 00In context, if April is in the past, then the sentence sounds fine to me. 0-
— Mister Micawber
0The length of time is irrelevant.
' 02br 02br 00In context, if April is in the past, then the sentence sounds fine to me.
0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0The length of time is irrelevant. 'I had been screaming for three seconds when the dentist finally stopped drilling.' 02br 02br 00In context, if April is in the past, then the sentence sounds fine to me. 0-
0 Re: We had known each other for 3 years by April. 02br 02br 00If "April" is referring to "April" of years past, then it would be better to say, 02br 02br 00"We had known each other for 3 years THAT April." 02br 02br 00If "April" is referring to NEXT April (which I believe is in this case), then your sentence should be changed to, 0