Hi All,
I am not sure if this is the right forum to ask. Currently, I am working as an IT developer and have applied to move from a developer position to a business analyst position in the same company. My company has a policy that they have to consider and give priorities to internal candidates first. I got an interview with the director of the new department and get rejected as he told me my presentation was full of grammar mistakes. I asked him if he could give me some examples but he told me he did not have the notes right now (I don't think I will ever get a full evaluation from him). I did not try to argue with him as it is all up to him to accept my transfer request or not. However, I went through my slides a few times and could not find any major grammar mistakes. I attached my presentation here. If you have time, could you let me know if my presentation is really bad in terms of grammar only (not the content)?
My presentation could be downloaded from this link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1tksLb-w3OZoJef1zx4dscPIRY5KLfhbk
I have removed my name, company headers, and footers from the presentation for an anonymous reason. As my application was rejected, I just want to know if the grammar in my presentation was really bad. For internal transfer requests, the interview standard threshold to get accepted is very low. It is not really a real interview.
Thanks.
slide 1 - no errors slide 2: The major issue is that there seems to be no logical progression from one point to the next, so the talk seems chaotic. It is annoying to the reader. "Why replacing" is not a grammatical phrase.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
slide 1 - no errors
slide 2: The major issue is that there seems to be no logical progression from one point to the next, so the talk seems chaotic. It is annoying to the reader. "Why replacing" is not a grammatical phrase.
slide 3: BRD and BRD are not defined. If your audience knows these acronyms, that is not a real issue. Also, the title "problem" is not right. It is more of a