Grammar
Hello everyone,
Is it correct to use "plural auxiliary verb" after "who" as follows?
Who were here?
Who are here?
Who are clever?
Regards,
Joseph
Top answer
Joseph A Is it correct to use "plural auxiliary verb" after "who" as follows? Yes, but we don't ordinarily do it. " I will tell you how we say it rather than let "who" be plural in your examples.
- Joseph A Is it correct to use "plural auxiliary verb" after "who" as follows?
- Yes, but we don't ordinarily do it.
- " I will tell you how we say it rather than let "who" be plural in your examples.
- Annie (at Jill's house): I heard some of the local firemen were at your party.
- Jill: Yes, three or four.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Joseph AIs it correct to use "plural auxiliary verb" after "who" as follows?
Yes, but we don't ordinarily do it. Invent a context for "Who were here?" I will tell you how we say it rather than let "who" be plural in your examples.
Annie (at Jill's house): I heard some of the local firemen were at your party.
Jill: Yes, three or four.
0Joseph AIs it correct to use"plural auxiliary verb"a plural linking verb after "who" as follows?
No. Save that for sentences with 'they' or an explicit mention of more than one person.
Who are they? / Who were they?
Who are Jack and Jill? / Who were Jack and Jill?
Who are the
0
Related Questions