Hello dear experts, could I rephrase the following sentence without any changes in the meaning? What are differences in the meaning of these two sentences?
My family lived in Australia for a year when I was a child. to===> My family WAS LIVING in Australia for a year when I was a childAbbas Rajabpour could I rephrase the following sentence without any changes in the meaning? No. Abbas Rajabpour What are differences in the meaning of these two sentences?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Abbas Rajabpourcould I rephrase the following sentence without any changes in the meaning?
No.
Abbas RajabpourWhat are differences in the meaning of these two sentences?
The first is right and means that for one unbroken year during the period of time when you were between birth and whenever you stopped being a chi
Hello. I'm no expert, but I'd like to share my personal view on this one ??!
Grammer-wise, both are correct. The second, however, may sound a bit odd/confusing to some as then it seemingly is trying to encapsulate childhood, all of it, in year-length time, whereby it, Speaker's childhood, sounds like it occured within that one-year time window. It could make more sense if you, say, for e
A for-phrase of time contradicts the basic meaning of the past continuous tense. Those two grammatical elements are seldom combined.
The past continuous expresses an "open time period". There is no definite beginning and no definite end, so there is no way of knowing how long it lasts. The phrase for a year limits the time period by saying how long it lasts, so it indicat