0
Samersamer1974 Posted 11 years ago
Grammar
grammar
Hello
I have this question: " Throughout history people (moved-have moved) ,some migrants (chose,have chosen) to emigrate while the other people ( had,have) had to move because of wars.
In this question I chose these answers( have moved - chose- had had to).
My question is : is my answer here is right? and if no ,so,why?
thank you very much
I have this question: " Throughout history people (moved-have moved) ,some migrants (chose,have chosen) to emigrate while the other people ( had,have) had to move because of wars.
In this question I chose these answers( have moved - chose- had had to).
My question is : is my answer here is right? and if no ,so,why?
thank you very much
Top answer
samersamer1974 In this question I chose these answers( have moved - chose- had had to). Not quite—nor is the original sentence. Throughout history people have moved ; some migrants have chosen to emigrate, while others have had to move because of wars.
- samersamer1974 In this question I chose these answers( have moved - chose- had had to).
- Not quite—nor is the original sentence.
- Throughout history people have moved ; some migrants have chosen to emigrate, while others have had to move because of wars.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
5 Answers
0
samersamer1974In this question I chose these answers( have moved - chose- had had to).Not quite—nor is the original sentence.
Throughout history people have moved; some migrants have chosen to emigrate, while others have had to move because of wars.
00
Hello
Sorry, I forgot some words in this sentence : " Throughout history people ( moved ,have moved) from county to another country.some migrants ( chose-have chosen) to emigrate,while the others (had/have had to move because of wars.
- Was my answer right( have moved, chose, had had to).
- The second question is : Why is "had to" put after have or had on contrary "should have, must ha
Sorry, I forgot some words in this sentence : " Throughout history people ( moved ,have moved) from county to another country.some migrants ( chose-have chosen) to emigrate,while the others (had/have had to move because of wars.
- Was my answer right( have moved, chose, had had to).
- The second question is : Why is "had to" put after have or had on contrary "should have, must ha
00
samersamer1974Was my answer right( have moved, chose, had had to).I have given you the correct answer in my first post.
samersamer1974: Why is "had to" put after have or had on contrary "should have, must have....?It is present perfect of the semi-modal 'have to'. It refers to what some people have needed to do throughout
00
Hello
But my English teacher( origin Arabic) said to me that the answer is ( have move, chose, had had to),because one of the uses of present perfect is : in new information or news reports ,we can the present perfect in the first sentence then we continue the remain sentence in past simple. is it right?
thank you very much
But my English teacher( origin Arabic) said to me that the answer is ( have move, chose, had had to),because one of the uses of present perfect is : in new information or news reports ,we can the present perfect in the first sentence then we continue the remain sentence in past simple. is it right?
thank you very much
00
samersamer1974 in new information or news reports ,we can the present perfect in the first sentence then we continue the remain sentence in past simple. is it right?Not if the events happen(ed) at the same time, which is the case in your sentence: the moving and the emigrating are the same thing, happening simultaneously.
You noticed (I hope) that I
0
Related Questions