0
Myvi Posted 15 years ago
Grammar
Grammar
As a conclusion, direct approach performed better than reduction approach in terms of having less total number of steps, fewer function evaluations and consuming less execution time besides having acceptable accuracy. The ZZZ also give the results that show it can solve higher order problems in a code itself.
Does this text correct in grammatical manner? Thanks a lot..
Does this text correct in grammatical manner? Thanks a lot..
Top answer
Hi, As a conclusion, direct approach performed better than reduction approach in terms of having less total number of steps, fewer function evaluations and consuming less execution time besides having acceptable accuracy. The ZZZ also give the results that show it can solve higher order problems in a code itself. Does this text correct in grammatical manner?
- Hi, As a conclusion, direct approach performed better than reduction approach in terms of having less total number of steps, fewer function evaluations and consuming less execution time besides having acceptable accuracy.
- The ZZZ also give the results that show it can solve higher order problems in a code itself.
- Does this text correct in grammatical manner?
- Thanks a lot.
- In conclusion, the direct approach performed better than the reduction approach.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
9 Answers
0
Hi,
As a conclusion, direct approach performed better than reduction approach in terms of having less total number of steps, fewer function evaluations and consuming less execution time besides having acceptable accuracy. The ZZZ also give the results that show it can solve higher order problems in a code itself.
Does this text correct in grammatical manner? Thanks a lot.
As a conclusion, direct approach performed better than reduction approach in terms of having less total number of steps, fewer function evaluations and consuming less execution time besides having acceptable accuracy. The ZZZ also give the results that show it can solve higher order problems in a code itself.
Does this text correct in grammatical manner? Thanks a lot.
00
Clive, how about this sentence?
As the tolerance is decreased, the efficiency of *** is better than the YYY. It is because the execution time taken by *** is less more than half of the time required by YYY.
Thanks a lot....
As the tolerance is decreased, the efficiency of *** is better than the YYY. It is because the execution time taken by *** is less more than half of the time required by YYY.
Thanks a lot....
00
Hi,
how about this sentence?
As the tolerance is decreased, the efficiency of *** is better than the YYY. It is because the execution time taken by *** is less more than half of the time required by YYY.
As the tolerance is decreased, *** becomes more efficient than YYY. This is because the execution time of *** is less than half that of YYY.
how about this sentence?
As the tolerance is decreased, the efficiency of *** is better than the YYY. It is because the execution time taken by *** is less more than half of the time required by YYY.
As the tolerance is decreased, *** becomes more efficient than YYY. This is because the execution time of *** is less than half that of YYY.
00
Clive, is it ok to say "This is because the execution time of *** is less more than half that of YYY."
Thanks a lot...
Thanks a lot...
00
0
Ok..Thanks..My last question is how about this text clive? Thanks a lot...
"The pattern of the results shown by 4XXX is similar as 2XXX and 3XXX in which it required fewer total steps and function evaluations than 4YYY. Consequently, it consumed less execution time than the 4YYY. So that, it can be said that the direct method is efficient than reduction one while had acceptable accuracy b
"The pattern of the results shown by 4XXX is similar as 2XXX and 3XXX in which it required fewer total steps and function evaluations than 4YYY. Consequently, it consumed less execution time than the 4YYY. So that, it can be said that the direct method is efficient than reduction one while had acceptable accuracy b
00
Hi,
Sorry, it is full of errors.
Truthfully, and without meaning to offend you, my opinion is that your level of Englsih is not high enough to write about such complex topics. Is there some way that you can find someone to assist you, eg a grad student with proficient English?
Sorry, it is full of errors.
Truthfully, and without meaning to offend you, my opinion is that your level of Englsih is not high enough to write about such complex topics. Is there some way that you can find someone to assist you, eg a grad student with proficient English?
00
0
Hi,
The pattern of the results shown by 4XXX is similar as 2XXX and 3XXX in which it required fewer total steps and function evaluations than 4YYY. Consequently, it consumed less execution time than the 4YYY. So that, it can be said that the direct method is efficient than reduction one while had acceptable accuracy between the prescribed toleran
The pattern of the results shown by 4XXX is similar as 2XXX and 3XXX in which it required fewer total steps and function evaluations than 4YYY. Consequently, it consumed less execution time than the 4YYY. So that, it can be said that the direct method is efficient than reduction one while had acceptable accuracy between the prescribed toleran
0
Related Questions