0
Myvi Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Grammar

"As was expected direct integration will save the function evaluation even though in some cases, the total steps taken by direct method and reduce method are same such as are seen in Table 25. It is well known that this direct integration approach solve the higher-order problem without the need to recasting the problem to a system of first-order equations and the reduction approach will have more function to be evaluated and this expectation had been revealed in the Tables 23-30. Therefore, the burden/cost of computation taken by direct method reduced especially as step size becomes smaller."

I am glad if somebody can check the grammar.. Thanks a lot..
  

Top answer

As was expected , direct integration will save [ time? data? what?

— Mister Micawber

  • As was expected , direct integration will save [ time?
  • data?
  • what?
  • ) the function evaluation even though in some cases, the total steps taken for the direct and reduction methods are the same (Table 25).
  • This direct integration approach solves higher-order problems without the need to recast the problem as a series of first-order equations , and the reduction approach will have more function to be evaluated ( meaning??
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

8 Answers
0
As was expected, direct integration will save [time? data? what?] in (?) the function evaluation even though in some cases, the total steps taken for the direct and reduction methods are the same (Table 25). This direct integration approach solves higher-order problems without the need to recast the problem as a series of
0
0
Actually I want to say that the direct method can save the number of function to be evaluated even though in some cases the number of steps taken by the direct and reduction method are same. It is because from Tables we see that direct method has less value of total function evaluation compare to reduction method.
0
0
save the number of function to be evaluated -- I don't see how you can 'save' functions. Do you mean 'minimize'?
0
0
Exactly sir..Then, all the term 'save' I shoud change wit 'minimize' right?

As was expected, direct integration will minimize the number of function evaluation even though in some cases, the total steps taken for the direct and reduction methods are the same (Table 25). This direct integration approach solves higher-order problems without the need to recast the problem as a series
0
0
I'm not sure that 'minimize' works best throughout your text, but it makes more sense to me here.

As was expected, direct integration minimizes the number of function evaluations, even though in some cases, total steps required for both methods are the same (Table 25). This direct integration approach solves higher-order problems without the need to reca
0
0
For direct approach, we have to reduce the higher-order problem to a series of first-order equations. Because of that, more functions are needed to be evaluated compared to direct approach. Is it clear sir?
0
0
For the direct approach, we reduce the higher-order problem to a series of first-order equations. Therefore, fewer functions need evaluation than for the reduction approach.
0
0
As was expected, direct integration minimizes the number of function evaluations as was done by ABC compared to DEF even though in some cases, total steps required for both methods are the same (Table 57 at step size 0.1). This direct integration approach solves higher-order problems without the need to recast the problem as a system of first-order equations. Therefore, fewer functions need evalua
0

Related Questions