0
Everlastinghope Posted 17 years ago
Grammar
Grammar
Please,could you tell me what is correct:"not to do something or to not do something"?.
I read this but I didn't get the meaning:
No one here at Language Log Plaza seems to have commented on the cartoon in The New Yorker of 4/18/05, p. 14, in which one woman says to another, on the street, walking past a restaurant, "I'm moving to France to not get fat."
It's a virtually obligatorily split infinitive. The not can't move "down" into the VP get fat, because of the conditions on the VP negator not. If it moves "up", to before the to, then we get something with the wrong meaning.
The crucial thing here is that we're dealing with a purpose adverbial to get fat 'in order to get fat'. Not in combination with its VP (get fat) at least implicates agency on the part of the referent of the higher subject; 'in order to not get fat'. (I am not a semanticist, though I play one at Language Log Plaza, so go easy on me here.) But not to get fat is going to get the wider scope semantically: 'not in order to get fat'. And that's not what this woman wanted to say.
zwicky at-sign csli csli period stanford period edu
I read this but I didn't get the meaning:
Not to or to not
No one here at Language Log Plaza seems to have commented on the cartoon in The New Yorker of 4/18/05, p. 14, in which one woman says to another, on the street, walking past a restaurant, "I'm moving to France to not get fat."It's a virtually obligatorily split infinitive. The not can't move "down" into the VP get fat, because of the conditions on the VP negator not. If it moves "up", to before the to, then we get something with the wrong meaning.
The crucial thing here is that we're dealing with a purpose adverbial to get fat 'in order to get fat'. Not in combination with its VP (get fat) at least implicates agency on the part of the referent of the higher subject; 'in order to not get fat'. (I am not a semanticist, though I play one at Language Log Plaza, so go easy on me here.) But not to get fat is going to get the wider scope semantically: 'not in order to get fat'. And that's not what this woman wanted to say.
zwicky at-sign csli csli period stanford period edu
Top answer
Hello EH, I would say that the position of "not" is emphatic, in the caption: it in effect creates a mildly humorous verb ("to not-get-fat"). Best wishes, MrP
- Hello EH, I would say that the position of "not" is emphatic, in the caption: it in effect creates a mildly humorous verb ("to not-get-fat").
- Best wishes, MrP
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Hello EH,
I would say that the position of "not" is emphatic, in the caption: it in effect creates a mildly humorous verb ("to not-get-fat").
Best wishes,
MrP
I would say that the position of "not" is emphatic, in the caption: it in effect creates a mildly humorous verb ("to not-get-fat").
Best wishes,
MrP
0
Related Questions