0
Anonymous Posted 12 years ago
Grammar
Gramatical dilemma...
is the underlined part okay? or how can I change it?
Therefore the creditor who acts as a recoverer in this case has no rights to request to direct the recovery against other properties or monetary means of the debtor.
Are usage of double "to" allowed?
Thanks!
Therefore the creditor who acts as a recoverer in this case has no rights to request to direct the recovery against other properties or monetary means of the debtor.
Are usage of double "to" allowed?
Thanks!
Top answer
" form, but it does not make sense here. The language is confusing as it stands. It is too legalistic.
- " form, but it does not make sense here.
- The language is confusing as it stands.
- It is too legalistic.
- So I am not sure what you want to say.
- Here are a couple of possible wordings.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
There is nothing wrong with the "to...to..." form, but it does not make sense here.
The language is confusing as it stands. It is too legalistic. So I am not sure what you want to say. Here are a couple of possible wordings.
Therefore the creditor, who acts as a recoverer in this case, has no right to direct the recovery against other properties or monetary resources owned by
The language is confusing as it stands. It is too legalistic. So I am not sure what you want to say. Here are a couple of possible wordings.
Therefore the creditor, who acts as a recoverer in this case, has no right to direct the recovery against other properties or monetary resources owned by
0
Related Questions