Good style?

Question

What do you think about frequently occuring word combinations like "to open an object"?
For me, it sounds rather stupid and funny.
In my language, such combinations are impossible.
Because there is no logic in those.
You can open a door as such,
but you cannot open an object AS SUCH.
I am not sure that you feel it right.
However,:
What do you think about it, and, if you know, then answer, please, what English stylistics says about it (if says whatever).

Usenet · Accepted Answer

[nq:1]What do you think about frequently occuring word combinations like "to open an object"? For me, it sounds rather stupid ... is no logic in those. You can open a door as such, but you cannot open an object AS SUCH.[/nq]
I think that "opening an object" is computer programming jargon, and the expression would not be used in any other context. I've never seen it used elsewhere, so I am surprised that you describe it as "frequently occurring". I agree that in "normal English" it would make no sense.
John Hall "He crams with cans of poisoned meat
The subjects of the King,
And when they die by thousands G.K.Chesterton: Why, he laughs like anything." from "Song Against Grocers"

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]What do you think about frequently occuring word combinations like "to open an object"?[/nq]
Never heard the phrase.
[nq:1]For me, it sounds rather stupid and funny. In my language, such combinations are impossible. Because there is no logic in those.[/nq]
Your language is logical? Which one is that?
[nq:1]You can open a door as such, but you cannot open an object AS SUCH.[/nq]
Every time you stop using a collection of papers, you close the file. But that's not what the phrase "to close the file" means.

And if I press my suit, it doesn't mean I look tidy for a change.

Paul Burke

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]What do you think about frequently occuring word combinations like "to open an object"?[/nq]
[nq:1]Never heard the phrase.You are lucky. Your language is logical?If I don't overestimate you, you try to catch me.[/nq]
And don't underestimate me, please.
I think we both undestand it right.
So I used my phrase about logic in the right sense. If you don't mind.

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]What do you think about frequently occuring word combinations like ... as such, but you cannot open an object AS SUCH.[/nq]
[nq:1]I think that "opening an object" is computer programming jargon, and the expression would not be used in any other ... am surprised that you describe it as "frequently occurring". I agree that in "normal English" it would make no sense.[/nq]
It is frequently occuring in computer games,
but they always mean wardrobe, box or similar things. So I think that it is semi-(computer jargon). Not programming, at least. It's language fact of common life , rather than of professional activity.
But I'm pleased that you understood my question
and answered it as I... expected? suspected.

Usenet · Answer

Irritated Foreigner schrieb:
[nq:1]It is frequently occuring in computer games, but they always mean wardrobe, box or similar things. So I think that it is semi-(computer jargon). Not programming, at least. It's language fact of common life , rather than of professional activity.[/nq]
It's not a case of opening an object in general - it's a case of opening a container - wardrobes, boxes, cases, briefcases, are containers and when they are closed it is impossible to access their contents, therefore you have to open them. this is quite normal English. And I must say that there are parallel phrases in the other (European) languages I know - nothing illogical as far as I can see.

Einde O'Callaghan

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]Your language is logical?[/nq]
[nq:1]If I don't overestimate you, you try to catch me.[/nq]
No catch. I'd like to know which language is logical, that's all.

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]Irritated Foreigner schrieb:[/nq]
[nq:2]It is frequently occuring in computer games, but they always ... fact of common life , rather than of professional activity.[/nq]
[nq:1]It's not a case of opening an object in general - it's a case of opening a container - wardrobes, ... there are parallel phrases in the other (European) languages I know - nothing illogical as far as I can see.[/nq]
Thank you for your reply.
But my question was about word usage, not about meaning. I know what they mean, but how they write!
If I use such word as "object", this usage must mean something. For example, if I call a cow "even-toed", the context must be zoology. In other contexts, usually, such usage is funny.
Because the fact (that a cow is even-toed) is irrelevant. ("Even-toed, come here!")
"Even-toed", as such, is not supposed to be summoned.

So if you are going to open something, there is no contextual reason to call it "object". "Object", as such, is not supposed to be opened.
That is the question. Semantic agreement. If the second case is normal, why the first is not?

Usenet · Answer

[nq:2]If I don't overestimate you, you try to catch me.[/nq]
[nq:1]No catch. I'd like to know which language is logical, that's all.[/nq]
In this sense, none.

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]It is frequently occuring in computer games, but they always mean wardrobe, box or similar things. So I think that it is semi-(computer jargon). Not programming, at least. It's language fact of common life , rather than of professional activity.[/nq]
I was thinking of programming in "object-oriented" languages.
[nq:1]But I'm pleased that you understood my question and answered it as I... expected? suspected.[/nq]
"Expected" is correct there.

John Hall "He crams with cans of poisoned meat
The subjects of the King,
And when they die by thousands G.K.Chesterton: Why, he laughs like anything." from "Song Against Grocers"

Usenet · Answer

[nq:1]Thank you for your reply. But my question was about word usage, not about meaning. I know what they mean, ... to be opened. That is the question. Semantic agreement. If the second case is normal, why the first is not?[/nq]
'Objects' in a situation like a computer game (and also in other, day to day, situations) is merely a general purpose term for many different 'things'. Some 'objects' you can pick up and carry (for example: a knife, a key, a book, and many others); some objects you can read (a notice, a newspaper, a book, and many others) and some objects you can open (a door, a chest, a book, and many others).

David - toro-danyo atcost uku fullstop co fullstop uk http://www.toro-danyo.uku.co.uk/

Good style?

Top answer

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

Related Questions