I would guess it means that any money paid to Sterling would have to be immediately returned to the payer.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fivejedjonIf you read the whole article, you will see that, if Sterling wins the case, his wife and family trust will repay the money to the other side. Overall, one part of the Sterling family will repay the money paid to another part.In that case, I wonder whether it should actually say "may go into one pocket and back out of the other"?
fivejedjonIf you read the whole article, you will see that, if Sterling wins the case, his wife and family trust will repay the money to the other side. Overall, one part of the Sterling family will repay the money paid to another part.I've read the whole article but it wasn't clear to me which pocket is which. Now I understand that the 'paying' pocket is the
AnonymousI've read the whole article but it wasn't clear to me which pocket is which. Now I understand that the 'paying' pocket is the pocket of the buyer and the 'paying back' pocket is the pocket of the Sterling family trust, not the Sterling's one. In such a situation, even though Sterling wins the case he will never get the money as it is paid straight to the trust by
GPYI'm not sure I understand this. The pocket referred to in "out of one pocket" is a paying pocket. The pocket referred to in "back in the other" is a receiving pocket. It is implied that these two pockets belong to the same party.I think that you are right, my understanding of that is maybe not correct. Now, I think that both pockets are the ones which belo
AnonymousI think that you are right, my understanding of that is maybe not correct. Now, I think that both pockets are the ones which belong to the buyer: he pays to the trust from his one pocket and next, he is paid back with the same money which he puts to his other pocket.That was my original understanding. However, taking into account what fivejedjon says