0
Taka Posted 14 years ago
Grammar
Glad
Do these two have the same meaning?
I'm glad that I stopped smoking.
I'm glad to have stop smoking.
And these two. Are they semantically the same?
It is good that I stopped smoking.
It is good to have stopped smoking.
I'm glad that I stopped smoking.
I'm glad to have stop smoking.
And these two. Are they semantically the same?
It is good that I stopped smoking.
It is good to have stopped smoking.
Top answer
Of course the fourth version leaves us to assume who might have stopped smoking, absent context. )
- Of course the fourth version leaves us to assume who might have stopped smoking, absent context.
- )
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
4 Answers
0
Of course the fourth version leaves us to assume who might have stopped smoking, absent context.
(It could mean, "It is good that you/she/we/they stopped smoking.")
(You could argue that this sort of judgement is usually personal.)
(It could mean, "It is good that you/she/we/they stopped smoking.")
(You could argue that this sort of judgement is usually personal.)
00
AvangiOf course the fourth version leaves us to assume who might have stopped smoking, absent context.(It could mean, "It is good that you/she/we/they stopped smoking.")(You could argue that this sort of judgement is usually personal.)Other than that, there is no difference between them?
(If the fourth version was 'It's good for me to have stopped sm
00
0
Related Questions