I guess that 'myself' has been omitted in this sentence.
Let's take a look at "I got my purse stolen.". In this example, 'my purse' was stolen. And 'I' became the victim of that.
Similarly, in the first example, 'I' was beaten up." And 'I' became the victim of that. Thinking this way, we can conclude that "myself" has been omitted, though it may still exist in the deep structure of the sentence.
Top answer
So, what's your question? 1. I got myself beaten up 2.
— Ant_222
So, what's your question?
1.
I got myself beaten up 2.
I got my purse stolen Note, that "the purse" of the second sentence corresponds to "myself" of the first, so even if you want to treat these sentences your way, I'll only agree that "myself" is omitted only in your first sentence.
But I don't see a reason to analyze such structures as you do.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1. I got myself beaten up 2. I got my purse stolen
Note, that "the purse" of the second sentence corresponds to "myself" of the first, so even if you want to treat these sentences your way, I'll only agree that "myself" is omitted only in your first sentence.
But I don't see a reason to analyze such structures as you do. I rather treat the
I got myself beaten up. The use of the reflexive pronoun suggests that I was responsible for the action in some way. eg I got myself beaten up, because I made a lot of extremely offensive remarks to two very big and very drunk men in a bar.
I got beaten up. This does not suggest that it was my fault. It me
"I got myself beaten up" is structurally equivalent to "I got my car washed".
So we can say that "I" is the subject and the actuator in both cases. If no object is specified, "get" starts to work like a passive verb, ascrbing the action to an external force.
Sounds like an excerpt from one of those brain-bre