I recently reviewed gerunds and some questions popped up in my mind: how is the difference between simple present tenses and gerunds(the ones which work as objects of prepositions) stablished? This whole review made me question some of the knowledge which has been taken by me as certain through a long time: is it acceptable to apply simple present verbs as objects in a phrase?Or should gerunds be used instead? Is it correct that, when two or more verbs coexist in the same sentence, one of them should be used as a substantive and, therefore, as a gerund?
In the following sentences, I started to question myself:
1) It is important to understand the human species x It is important understanding the human species
2) I love to go to the mall x I love going to the mall
I already appreciate your help!
Pedro Henrique Dias Oliveira difference between simple present tenses and gerunds Gerunds have an -ing ending. The simple present does not. I don't object to going with them.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Pedro Henrique Dias Oliveiradifference between simple present tenses and gerunds
Gerunds have an -ing ending. The simple present does not.
I don't object to going with them. (gerund)
We go to the movies every Saturday night. (simple present tense)
All verb tenses other than the affirmative simple tens
Pedro Henrique Dias Oliveirais it acceptable to apply simple present verbs as objects in a phrase? Or should gerunds be used instead?
If you want to place a verb after a preposition, the verb must be in the -ing form.
This pitcher is used for watering the flowers.
Subjects and objects of sentences which are verbs must