0
Falconer Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Gerund or not?

Hello.

I was hoping that you could shed some light on whether the following construction is a gerund (or compound gerund, perhaps).

"With him being so close in age and having similar interests, I'm sure they'll get along fine."

"With his being so close in age and having similar interests, I'm sure they'll get along fine."

It seems to me that the latter is the correct one, but it's been a while since I actively used English.
  

Top answer

The latter is indeed the 'correct' one for formal writing, and 'being' is a gerund. The first sentence is however becoming more and more common, and is seldom complained about nowadays (except by me).

  • The latter is indeed the 'correct' one for formal writing, and 'being' is a gerund.
  • The first sentence is however becoming more and more common, and is seldom complained about nowadays (except by me).
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
The latter is indeed the 'correct' one for formal writing, and 'being' is a gerund. The first sentence is however becoming more and more common, and is seldom complained about nowadays (except by me).
0
I HAVE CHECKED MY GRAMMAR BOOKS BEFORE POSTING

(1) I most respectfully suggest that at least some English usage

experts say that neither one of your sentences is "really"

correct -- although, of course, they are very common.

(2) These experts (such as Mr. Bryan A. Garner in his Dictionary of

Modern American Usage) would have yo
0
Mister MicawberThe latter is indeed the 'correct' one for formal writing, and 'being' is a gerund. The first sentence is however becoming more and more common, and is seldom complained about nowadays (except by me).
Thank you. That the former was the more colloquial option seemed clear, but I wasn't entirely certain of whether it was a gerund.
0
Anonymous(1) I most respectfully suggest that at least some English usage

experts say that neither one of your sentences is "really"

correct -- although, of course, they are very common.
I'd be interested to know why. Whilst I don't find them very appealing, I wouldn't have said that they were incorrect (the latter, anyway). I didn't write
0
I HAVE CHECKED MY GRAMMAR BOOKS BEFORE POSTING

(1) If I understand Mr. Garner's reasoning:

(a) Adding with changes a nominative absolute to what he

calls an "objective absolute." (I guess that he means the preposition

with throws he (nominative) into the objective (him). Mr. Garner does

not seem happy with this.

Related Questions