I think that the infinitive form is not so much incorrect as 'stuffy' in these situations. Not a natural way of speaking. It may have a place in very formal circumstances.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Regarding the parallelism necessary can we say that when we put a verb after a preposition, we normally use an -ing form not an infinitive;After a preposition only the gerund form is used. That's true. You are quite right about that. But it has nothing to do with parallelism. It's just a rule that applies regardless of whether
01cite10Mister Micawber12cite10Propriety also depends on the situation, Koyama. If we are referring to the action or process, then the infinitive does not work, as in: 12br
12br
11b10X12b10 'To sneeze spreads germs.' (wrong)-- This one is extremely awkward, because it is not the concept but the proc
01cite10CalifJim12cite10After a preposition only the gerund form is used. That's true. You are quite right about that. 12br10Hi CJ02br
12blockquote
AnonymousAs far as I know, bold "to" after "for" does not make "carry" a noun. It's just an infinitive of purpose.I don't know anyone that has considered carry a noun in "coming for to carry me home". What is odd is that an infinitive is used after a