0
Komountain Posted 22 years ago
Grammar

Gerund or Infinitive?

One grammar book says that when you make a general statement, be sure to use a gerund form as its subject, not an infinitive form. Let me cite the example sentences from the book.

Playing games is a fun way of improving your memory skills. (right)
To play games is a fun way of improving your memory skills. (wrong)

The other book, however, says differently. It says both are correct.

To work provides people with personal satisfaction as well as money. (right)
Working provides people with personal satisfaction as well as money. (right)

To sneeze spread germs. (right)
Sneezing spread germs. (right)

To shoplift is considered a serious crime. (right)
Shoplifting is considered a serious crime. (right)

So, naturally I am in a fog. Please help me dissipate it.
  

Top answer

I think that the infinitive form is not so much incorrect as 'stuffy' in these situations. Not a natural way of speaking. It may have a place in very formal circumstances.

  • I think that the infinitive form is not so much incorrect as 'stuffy' in these situations.
  • Not a natural way of speaking.
  • It may have a place in very formal circumstances.
  • 'To err is human; to forgive divine' being the classic example.
  • I can't see the bible being re-written to 'erring is human; forgiving divine'.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

16 Answers
0
I think that the infinitive form is not so much incorrect as 'stuffy' in these situations. Not a natural way of speaking.

It may have a place in very formal circumstances. 'To err is human; to forgive divine' being the classic example. I can't see the bible being re-written to 'erring is human; forgiving divine'.
0
Propriety also depends on the situation, Koyama. If we are referring to the action or process, then the infinitive does not work, as in:

X 'To sneeze spreads germs.' (wrong)-- This one is extremely awkward, because it is not the concept but the process that does the spreading.
'Sneezing spreads germs.' (right)-- Therefore, only this version makes good sense.

'Playi
0
So shall we say it is a correct usage when there is a parallelism within the action performed and the verbal given;

'Playing games is a fun way of improving your memory skills.' (right)
'To play games is a fun way to improve your memory skills.' (right)

Regarding the parallelism necessary can we say that when we put a verb after a prepo
0
I've always thought of the gerund as the concept of an action, rather than the process or actual occurrence of an action. If what you want in the sentence is a noun, contemporary English speakers prefer gerunds. That's why they tend to be preferred for subjects. Because a preposition takes a noun object, gerunds should likewise be used, as per your examples.

An infinitive, on the oth
0
Regarding the parallelism necessary can we say that when we put a verb after a preposition, we normally use an -ing form not an infinitive;
After a preposition only the gerund form is used. That's true. You are quite right about that. But it has nothing to do with parallelism. It's just a rule that applies regardless of whether
0
0 FYI: this quote is actually from Alexander Pope in "An Essay on Criticism." I forgive you. 0-
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Mister Micawber12cite10Propriety also depends on the situation, Koyama. If we are referring to the action or process, then the infinitive does not work, as in: 12br
12br
11b10X12b10 'To sneeze spreads germs.' (wrong)-- This one is extremely awkward, because it is not the concept but the proc
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10CalifJim12cite10After a preposition only the gerund form is used. That's true. You are quite right about that. 12br
12blockquote
10Hi CJ02br
02br
00Just out of curiosity: could you please tell me what your opinion on 01i00"Swing low, sweet chariot, coming 01b
0
Hi CB,
As far as I know, bold "to" after "for" does not make "carry" a noun. It's just an infinitive of purpose.
0
AnonymousAs far as I know, bold "to" after "for" does not make "carry" a noun. It's just an infinitive of purpose.

I don't know anyone that has considered carry a noun in "coming for to carry me home". What is odd is that an infinitive is used after a

Related Questions