I'm an EFL teacher with an unusual question. I have asked some of my collegues, to no effect, so I thought I'd post here for some ideas if possible.
We've been discussing a letter that we received from a company, who made an error with an order that we made. Their response included:
"as far as we can tell..." blah blah blah and "because this is the case"
Now, to me, there is a massive gap in logic between those two sentences. "Because" implies there is evidence. "As far as we can tell" implies they have no substantial evidence.
My question: how do I explain this lack of logical reasoning. Is there a special way (or phrase) to describe a conclusion that has been made using a break in logic?
Many thanks
Andy
Top answer
You could just call it 'an invalid argument'. Clive
— Clive
You could just call it 'an invalid argument'.
Clive
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.