0
Cup cake Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Future Perfect vs Future Continuous

Hi Everyone,

I was teaching the two tenses mentioned above today. I know how to use them both, but when you compare the two it can be tricky.

For example:

1) Bill will have camped out all night on the weekend.
2) Bill will be camping out all night on the weekend.

Why would you chose one over the other?

Slightly confused.
Thanks Emotion: smile
CC
  

Top answer

Cup cake Why would you chose one over the other? I would choose #2 because it is the natural choice: a future form for a future action. #1 is formal and is not used except when the writer wishes, for some reason.

  • Cup cake Why would you chose one over the other?
  • I would choose #2 because it is the natural choice: a future form for a future action.
  • #1 is formal and is not used except when the writer wishes, for some reason.
  • to view the future event from further in the future; otherwise, it just sounds stilted.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
Cup cakeWhy would you chose one over the other?
I would choose #2 because it is the natural choice: a future form for a future action. #1 is formal and is not used except when the writer wishes, for some reason. to view the future event from further in the future; otherwise, it just sounds stilted.
0
Thanks Mr. M. Emotion: angel

I had a tiny bit of trouble explaining when they would use the future perfect and when they'd use the futu
0
Cup cakeBill will have camped out all night on the weekend.
You'd only use this if you wanted to claim that sometime next week Bill will be able to say "I've camped out all night" — not the kind of thing you often want to say.
0
Lol...that's hilarious CJ. Emotion: giggle

Maybe that's why I struggle a bit with the future perfect, and future perfect continuous too
0
BTW, I've just done the test myself.

Why can't we say the following:

'I don't think I will have retired before I'm 65.'

I'm stumped on this one.
0
That one sounds OK to me, Cup cake; it is just an uncommon way to view the situation.
0
Cup cakeI don't think I will have retired before I'm 65.
It sounds a little anomalous to my ear. It's the combination of "will have" with "before" that bothers me. It gives too many time references for a normal brain to handle.

......think.....................will have < < < < will ............I'm 65.......

I'd probably s
0
Is it correct to say: He will have retired by now?

kw
0
AnonymousIs it correct to say: He will have retired by now?kw
Yes.

CJ
0
CalifJimYes.
Thank you for the reply.

Related Questions