0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar
Future from past
It was the loss of revenue from declines in tourism that in 1935 led the Saudi authorities granting a concession for oil exploration to the company that would later be known by the name of Aramco.
AND
It was the loss of revenue from declines in tourism that in 1935 led the Saudi authorities’ granting a concession for oil exploration to the company that later to be known as Aramco.
Can "to be"... be used to predict future from the Past?
what is the difference between :
later to be known as Aramco. Vs that would later be known by the name of Aramco.
AND
It was the loss of revenue from declines in tourism that in 1935 led the Saudi authorities’ granting a concession for oil exploration to the company that later to be known as Aramco.
Can "to be"... be used to predict future from the Past?
what is the difference between :
later to be known as Aramco. Vs that would later be known by the name of Aramco.
Top answer
Anonymous what is the difference between : that would later be known by the name of Aramco. / that later to be known as Aramco . The difference is that the second version of your sentence is incorrect.
- Anonymous what is the difference between : that would later be known by the name of Aramco.
- / that later to be known as Aramco .
- The difference is that the second version of your sentence is incorrect.
- The word 'that' introduces a relative clause.
- The clause is grammatically incorrect with only a to-infinitive in it.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Anonymouswhat is the difference between :
The difference is that the second version of your sentence is incorrect.
The word 'that' introduc
0
Related Questions