0 I have read in many grammar books that a sentence of future continuous tense cannot be changed into passive voice. For example: 01b00You will be writting a letter02b00. According to the rules which i have read this sentence cannot be changed into passive voice. 02br 00I just want to know that is this an authentic rule or not? 02br 00Thank you.0-
Top answer
02br 02br 00Thanks, 0-
— SunFlowerSeed
02br 02br 00Thanks, 0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 The passive would be: 01i02br 02br 00 *The letter01font00 will/would be being written02font00 by you. 02i02br 02br 00 which doesn't work, see: 02br 02br 01h3
0Hi guys,02br 02br 01font00A letter will be being written by you.02font02br 02br 01font00Grammatically, this is fine. 'Write' is not a non-continuous verb, and 'be' is just used here to form the auxiliary.02font02br 02br 01font00Semantica
0 The above being said, such continuous future passive constructions may be found at the BBC sites:-)).02br 02br 00 Thus, I wouldn't talk about a strict rule being in effect in this case. 02br 02br 01h2
0 Another quote, from fiction this time:02br 00 ------02br 01i00My client's ship on the other hand will be belching more fire than smoke and 01b00will be being attacked02b00 by all the enemy at once. 02i02br 02br 00 William Golding, Rites of Passage, p. 17202br 00 ----0-
The verb "attack' in the example sentence from the past posting is in passive voice. My client's ship on the other hand will be belching more fire than smoke and will be being attacked by all the enemy at once.