1.two lines move together in the same direction with similar distance. A schematic drawing is like this: |-------------> | | -------------> | Thanks for Micawber and enoon, I got " There's a coordinated shift of these two lines."
2.two lines move together in reverse direction with similar distance. A schematic drawing is like this: |-------------> | | <------------- | I think the sentence " There's a coordinated shift of these two lines." is not right here.
Could I use " There's a negatively coordinated shift of these two lines. " for case 2? And " There's a positively coordinated shift of these two lines. " for case 1?
Or if you have any new sentence for these 2 cases?
Many thanks. linwenzi
Top answer
Hi It looks to me that the lines represent two things moving in parallel - either in the same direction or in opposite direction Dave
— Dave_anon
Hi It looks to me that the lines represent two things moving in parallel - either in the same direction or in opposite direction Dave
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
In the first case, I would say that the lines are parallel, even if they show a different amount. If two cars set off along a track, from a starting line, but one goes faster than the other, I would say that their paths are parallel
In the second case, I'm not so sure. If the cars are moving in opposite directions - along an ordinary road, say - then I might write:
For some reason, the two sentences are now limited to use "coordinated" and "shift". Could you use "coordinated" and "shift" to distinguish these two cases?
I believe the phrase 'coordinated shift' is used mainly in scientific experiments where two different measurements are made - say, x and y. If, when a test is carried out, the values of x and y move together in a predictable way, then that is a coordinated shift
In that case, I think the phrase would apply even if the amounts were moving in different directions or by