0
Anonymous Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

functionality of would and could in the present and past

Hi,
Please look at these sentences and tell me the 'would' and 'could' are used in a past sense and has no present-time implications.

1. We were all watching in a sort of stunned silence waiting to see if we would be asked for money or if we were simply his audience.
2. While I was reading it, I could not help being concerned about young people in this country.

If we change the tenses to reflect the present time, the functions of 'would' and 'could' be different -- these will have present-time implications, IMO. Right?

1. We are all watching in a sort of stunned silence waiting to see if we would be asked for money or if we are simply his audience.
2. While I am reading it, I could not help being concerned about young people in this country.
  

Top answer

The first two are fine. The second two are wrong. In the second set, you have tenses that don't go together.

  • The first two are fine.
  • The second two are wrong.
  • In the second set, you have tenses that don't go together.
  • You need: We are all watching ...
  • to see if we will be asked ...
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
The first two are fine. The second two are wrong. In the second set, you have tenses that don't go together.
You need: We are all watching ... to see if we will be asked ... and While I am reading it, I cannot help being ...
While it is true that would and could are sometimes used in the context of present time, the contexts established in these sentences do
0
Thank you.

Would you say that the second set lacks proper context for their present-time usage since for the present-time uses, 'would' and 'could' have a sense of conditional -- depending on something to make the one with 'would' and 'could' to make it a reality or make it true. Correct? I think I understand somewhat fully the modal 'would' being conditional but don't have the same level
0
Anonymousbut don't have the same level of understanding as to the use of 'could' as conditional.
That's fairly easy to explain. The conditional meaning of could includes would:
I could go to the movie if I had enough money. = I would be able to go to the movie if I had enough money.
Could you do me a favor
0
Thank you, again.
I think I have seen Doll use this type of insertion technique to confirm the conditional nature of a sentence with the modal 'would'. Except the kind that is used for politeness, like your sentence here, would you say this is good to confirm the conditional nature of the modal 'would'? Can I do the same with what I consider to be conditional 'could'?

Your sentenc
0
Hi,

Are they wrong since the modal usages lack the fundamental conditional uses of the modals 'would' and 'could'?

1. We are all watching in a sort of stunned silence waiting to see if we would be asked for money or if we are simply his audience.
No conditional element present, thus 'will' is correct? Right?
2. While I am reading it, I could not help being concerned abo
0
AnonymousYour sentence with 'could' used for politness IMO:

Could you do me a favor? = Would you be able to do me a favor?
Yes. That's right. This illustrates that even the could of politeness includes would.
AnonymousCan I do this -- that is adding some words or phrases to vali
0
Are they wrong since the modal usages lack the fundamental conditional uses of the modals 'would' and 'could'? Not sure what you're asking. The correct sequence of tenses applies to conditionals as well as to non-conditionals.

1. We are all watching in a sort of stunned silence waiting to see if we would be asked for money or if we are simply his audi

Related Questions