Hello there,
please help me with the following question:
Are free relative clauses always noun clauses functioning as subjects/objects?
I understand that in the sentence
"Whoever has taken my money is a thief,"
the first part "Whoever has taken my money…" is a free relative clause/noun clause in the role of a subject.
Similarly, in the sentence "I see what you mean," the object
"... what you mean" is a free relative clause as well.
Are my sentences correctly analyzed?
Are free relative clauses always noun clauses? And vice versa:
Are all clauses acting as subjects and objects free relative clauses?
Thanks for your help in advance.
) In English grammar, a free relative clause is a type of relative clause (that is, a word group beginning with a wh-word) that contains the antecedent within itself. Also called a nominal relative clause, a fused relative construction, an independent relative clause, or (in traditional grammar) a noun clause. A free relative can refer to people or things, and it can function as a subject, a complement, or an object.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
(This terminology is not used in all linguistic systems.)
In English grammar, a free relative clause is a type of relative clause (that is, a word group beginning with a wh-word) that contains the antecedent within itself. Also called a nominal relative clause, a fused relative construction, an independent relative clause, or (in traditional grammar) a noun clause. A free relative can
pantaugrammar2Are free relative clauses always noun clauses functioning as subjects/objects? I understand that in the sentence "Whoever has taken my money is a thief," the first part "Whoever has taken my money…" is a free relative clause/noun clause in the role of a subject.
Whoever has taken my money is a thief.
Modern grammar takes th